// Training
Training a team in BIM: what makes the difference after the training
Published on 5 March 2026 · 6 min read · CADatWORK Learning
A successful training course isn't measured by end-of-session satisfaction, but by what remains in production three months later. On that criterion, the teaching content matters less than the organisation around it.
Assess before scheduling
A mixed-level group penalises everyone: beginners fall behind, autonomous users get bored. A prior level assessment makes it possible to form consistent groups and adjust the programme to the team's actual uses.
- An individual positioning assessment before the session
- Groups formed by level, not by department
- A programme aligned with current projects
Train on the team's own context
Working on a fictitious project produces skills that don't transfer. Training on the practice's own template, its classifications, schedules and exports allows what's learned to be applied the very next day.
Appoint an internal champion
Without an internal point of contact, questions that arise after the training go unanswered and old habits return. An identified champion, given dedicated time, is the best extension of a session.
Plan for follow-up time
A short session a few weeks after the training, on cases encountered in production, consolidates learning more than an extra day added upfront. That's where the real blockers get resolved.
Accept the temporary drop in pace
Changing method always slows things down at first. Announcing this phase and planning for it avoids the hasty conclusion that 'BIM wastes time' — a conclusion that brings the team back to its old habits.
Key takeaways
- A prior assessment avoids mixed-level groups.
- Training on the team's real templates and projects makes skills transferable.
- An internal champion extends the training where it stops.
- The initial drop in pace must be announced and planned for.
Go further
A project, a question?
Our interventions are built on your production context.
Contact us